site stats

Cocks v state of queensland

WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADT 3 Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 63 FCR 74 Creek v Raine & Horne Real Estate … WebMar 1, 2024 · State of Queensland v Masson [2024] HCA 28 Introduction. In State of Queensland v Masson [2024] HCA 28, the High Court overturned a medical negligence finding from the Queensland Court of Appeal where the State of Queensland had been found to be vicariously negligent in relation to the care provided by a Queensland …

Bibliography for LLB241 Queensland University of Technology

WebCocks v State of Queensland (1994) EOC 92–612. Google Scholar. ... Sinnapan v State of Victoria [1995] 2 VR 242 (1995a). Google Scholar. Slater v Brookton Farmers Co-operative Co Ltd (1990) EOC 92–321. Google Scholar. South West Africa Case (Second Phase) (1966) ICJR 4. Google Scholar. WebJan 1, 2024 · As such, it is also a core concern of architecture. This talk will provide insights into the Landmark decision in the case of the Sunshine Coast University Hospital, which is similar to other famous disability access decisions such as Cocks v State of Queensland and Cooper v Coffs Harbour. nails short courses https://amythill.com

AUSCRIPT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED

WebKalowski, R. & Gal, D. 1997 Case note: The Wik People v The State of Queensland and Others: The Thayorre People v The State of Queensland and Others (1997) 71 ALJR 173 Southern Cross University Law Review Vol 1 September 1997: 245 Background The Wik decision arose out of two native title claims in Queensland, by the Wik peoples and Web304 views, 11 likes, 0 loves, 1 comments, 3 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from The Picture Club: The grand staircase at the main entrance of the Brisbane... WebCocks v State of Queensland. Australian & New Zealand Equal Opportunity Law & Practice, 77281–77285. CCH Australia Limited. (1984e). Dr Siddiqui v Australian Medical Council. Australian & New Zealand Equal Opportunity Law & Practice, 74182–74185. CCH Australia Limited. (1984f). Flannery v O’Sullivan (No. 1). medium term investment options

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

Category:Cocks v State of Queensland. ACC 30684-2 on Vimeo

Tags:Cocks v state of queensland

Cocks v state of queensland

DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADT 3 (Member Atkinson) access to premises (Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre) special services or facilities exemption; … WebDec 5, 2016 · Wotton v State of Queensland (No 5) [2016] FCA 1457 (5 December 2016) Summary. Justice Mortimer in the Federal Court has ruled that the State of Queensland, acting through officers of the Queensland Police Service (QPS), engaged in unlawful discrimination under section 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RDA), in …

Cocks v state of queensland

Did you know?

WebAbstract: This article is a court decision from the Anti-Discrimination Board form a case between Kevin Cocks and the State of Queensland. The Board found in favour of the …

WebRoslyn Atkinson has served as member (1992-94) and inaugural President of the Queensland Anti-Discrimination Tribunal (1994-97). She decided many seminal cases … WebMagistrates Court of Queensland (QMC) 2006- (AustLII) Queensland Mental Health Court (QMHC) 2002- (AustLII) Queensland Planning and Environment Court (QPEC) 1999- …

WebTribunal, Cox v the State of Queensland. I understand Mr Cox, the complainant, is 5 present today. The case was about the Brisbane Convention Centre, which was then under construction, and which was designed with its main entrance to its foyer reached by a set of 27 steps. There was no means by which people with mobility WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADR 42 JM v QFG (1998) 1 Qd R 373 APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION: Applicant: D. O Gorman SC instructed by Robert Bax and Associates Respondent: C. Murdoch QC instructed by the Brisbane City Council REASONS FOR DECISION [1]Mr Yeo is a C4/C5 high level complete quadriplegic, and …

WebIn the case of Cocks v State of Queensland (1994), Kevin Cocks, a quadriplegia man in a wheel chair filed a case against the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre for not …

WebTribunal, Cox v the State of Queensland. I understand Mr Cox, the complainant, is 5 present today. The case was about the Brisbane Convention Centre, which was then … medium term investment planWebDick v University of Queensland [2000] 2 Qd R 476; Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 234; G D Searle v. Gunn ... Elliott [1987] 2 QdR 509; Hancock v State of Queensland [2002] QSC 27; Hawkins v.Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539; International General Electric Co of New York Limited v. Customs and Excise Commissioners [1962] Ch 784 ... medium term investment options in indiaWeb30684-2 Kevin Cocks, Queensland’s Anti-Discrimination Commissioner, shares a poignant personal story of his fight to enter with ease, dignity and respect one... medium term lesson plan templateWebJun 28, 2024 · The test for reasonableness of a term is described in Mahommed v State of Queensland [2006] QADT 21. The then President of the former tribunal said the test is an objective one, less demanding than a test of necessity but more demanding that a test of convenience. ... Kevin Cocks Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Queensland 21 … medium term notes indonesiaWebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADT 3. Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 63 FCR 74. Creek v Raine & Horne Real Estate Mossman [2011] QCATA 226. Druett v State of New South Wales [2000] HREOCA 12. Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118. medium term investmentsWebAug 4, 2024 · Read more about Mahommed v State of Queensland [2006] QADT 21. Back to top. High Court — no discrimination in jury exclusion. A complaint by a deaf woman, who was summoned for jury duty but excluded from a jury panel, is the first complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) to go all the way to the High Court of Australia. medium term investment accountWebExample: Kevin Cocks v State of Queensland is a real example. Kevin said he was indirectly discriminated against because the front entrance to the Brisbane Convention … nails shoreham by sea